Labuiristi already had one failed proposal that each child received a voucher for 5,000, which wo

Site names politics.co.uk interesting (to me it sounds familiar :-))) issued today an interesting article on the new government's proposals on the treatment of gifted students. On the same theme wrote Telegraph and first short explanation of what it does:
Already, however, there is a program college of aeronautics in which 5% of children with the best results in national tests at the age of 11 years is being listed in the "Register of talents" and receive extra help, so the ministry even able to contact each teacher at the children by name should be a special treat.
The problem is that about 30% of schools not nominated anyone for the so-called. "The National Academy of talented youth," partly college of aeronautics because some teachers resist ideological separation from other gifted children, and partly because in these schools, and there are no children in the 5% brightest Englishman.
Mentioned budget of around 65 million pounds (more than 650 million euros per gross neutrinovom rate applicable without looking at exchange rates), which would manage the non-profit college of aeronautics educational company Centre for British Teachers (CfBT), which won the tender.
Then make yourself able to choose whether you want to "buy" college of aeronautics a place in summer school for 100 points, evening on-line course for 50 or Saturday to learn Chinese for 80 points. Apparently, it could even take part in the courses conducted by the NASA space agency.
Labuiristi already had one failed proposal that each child received a voucher for 5,000, which would SVEKLI year could spend on private or public education, so that both the proposal - although modest scale to be quite controversial.
I especially like in this plan that can not allocate only 5% of the smartest but the top layer is applied individually to each school. So those schools in poorer and unhappier zones have equal opportunities to develop 10% of their best students and provide college of aeronautics them if you do not beat their peers in happier zones then at least equal footing with them.
Here is an example. In England, there are private and public schools. Private have their waiting lists, payable, some boarding and have the right to enter anyone want to school statute (be somewhat discriminating). Public schools must enroll children who are capable of schooling, college of aeronautics but (and here's the catch) in his "zone of entry." It is very well known exactly which school has that "zone entry" - local government issued clear instructions and maps showing boundaries. Zone is sure to overlap so that children with one address always have a choice of several public school that could go, but no one who is not under its enrollment zone is unable to attend a particular school. At Zagreb's example - can not be a child of Sestina go to school in Warsaw, irrespective of the parents wanted college of aeronautics and how many were willing to freight this child over half the city. The state controls the schools regularly and publicly announce (on the Internet) are their inspections and the results of state exams by subjects and periods (English have state tests on several key age groups). So parents can easily see what kind of academic education on average provides that school.
Why are you talking about? And because the effects of this system very interesting. No matter how unbelievable it may sound, but home prices in "enrollment zone" particularly good state schools are significantly higher than elsewhere. college of aeronautics People are willing to relocate just to make their child iso to a good school.
It would therefore be reasonable to expect that parents 'high-performing' children may be likely to move to areas with less talented children college of aeronautics to their children entered the 10% talented and eligible for additional training.
Maybe, but maybe not. However, even when this would happen - it would not necessarily be bad. In fact, it would be desirable favored mixing of children and prevent further break schools into good and bad. Now would namely those worse schools on average were better and would be able to provide more and children who remain in the 90% of the average.
There remains the problem of defining the 10%. Of course it would be awful if one is so far-reaching decision is a result of the current indisponiranosti child at the time of writing the test (either because of illness or because of some other external reasons). So it is very important that the choice of works and the need to find the right balance between objective measures (test results) and expertise of teachers who are in daily contact with students. But at the same time should be taken into account and that the teacher can be biased due to various reasons and therefore college of aeronautics the tests should not be completely excluded. In any case, the decision-making process would need to be studious and rational, and the ministry has already issued instructions to schools to access it. Particular emphasis is placed on identifying gifted among children who grow up in special circumstances which are not equal to their peers.
Another important thing is to ensure that gifted children are recognized college of aeronautics regardless college of aeronautics of the age at which their talent apparent. That is, if a child at 11 years old is 10% it does not necessarily mean that there will not be the 13 - which means that the process of establishing