Now watch: - It is the leading per capita, and we have a little, right? - Not telling you that the

I was reluctant to write about the referendum because it is absurd for anyone to common sense, with a little thought, if there is some particular has been awarded interests for anything bigger mess, was against joining the EU. Joining the EU is so superiran alternative that my entire discussion is simply paradoxical.
First The first and the basic thesis of which draw many of the arguments about why they need the EU, we also may be like Switzerland or Norway that were not included in the EU '(though we shrewdest people in the world). This is totally pointless because we have it 'could be' do we do now that at least, at least one, at least a half-step in that direction.
2nd There are lots of people who would not fit to join the EU because it regulates things, and they would like a mess, hunting in troubled waters, state facilitation (and far easier to deal with 'zemom' in some of our ministry, but the EU bureaucracy) and the Balkans.
3rd Many people do not think much about hunting in troubled waters, but they prefer the status quo (eg head of the fictional village in the public administration), not understanding that his position (because of our ... um ... bankrotića) is not sustainable. Man is a creature of the status quo, it's simply a genetic way (as it is innate laziness - you will agree, one that is 20,000 years ago by savanna ran and when he did not have, instead of resting, he was far less likely to propagate their genes ).
4th Many simply have not thought it through but are governed by a 'halo effect', where the error in the head observer has been awarded one feature of an object is transferred to the other. For example, less educated people overhear that financial markets in the EU is in trouble, and they conclude that "the has been awarded EU should not be 'etc.
A. It is the interest has been awarded of the EU, not our interest. Team had never heard of win-win. For example, we have a very untidy and careless tenants in an apartment building beautiful, maybe not perfect, but far better organized societies. has been awarded Leaky us water, installation of electricity hazard has been awarded of fire. Or shack leaning on a residential block, which is considerably richer, more orderly and more solid than our homes, and all the merits (they are for a reason such as they are, and what we have). Is neglected, at constant risk of fire and elevations are rats. Them in the interest that we fix it, to reduce the risks of fire, flood, make a better basis for the development of the neighborhood, etc. But it is also in our interest!
B.1. First nonsense about water because it is indicative of many other things. This deserves a little longer because the analysis is indicative of other things. I hope you understand the superficiality or ignorance or malevolence of people who use these arguments and conclude something has been awarded about the quality of their other arguments.
People, but even people in high places - moving from the phrase 'Croatia is one of the richest countries has been awarded in water in Europe. " - Then continue with frazetinom 'Water will be in the future is more important than oil' - and also points to the nonsense 'Europe will take it all. "
Source of the first phrase is UNESCO's World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), specifically this very table. In popular culture is entered via these vomit from the article, such as this one unsigned, I think it's even a first, and then the others passed.
Now watch: - It is the leading per capita, and we have a little, right? - Not telling you that the 'dependency ratio', ie the percentage of these resources come from abroad, for Croatia is one of the largest has been awarded in the world, 64%. Well of course! Because, as we know, the Danube and Sava not originate in the Republic of Croatia. - Why the EU does not 'hang' Gabon, which has 5 times more water per capita than the RC? (Andorra have already hung up, probably has been awarded because of the two streams that flow through it, albeit only seasonally when the snow is melting, which gives perhaps the highest per capita water - although the question of how much is in the 'dependency ratio, namely zabezecirano for those downstream ').
Even hated Serbia in fact there are far more water than us, but somehow they are not in the EU. I guess it must first drink our water! There I see the advantage of gradual expansion. Because when you dry up the Danube, the Serbs remain without electricity, so they can more easily be blackmailed.
In that up and you have a peer review (and lobotomized journalist and editor who has to let go), make sure "Of has been awarded all Croatian regions especially rich in water Lika, from which, has been awarded according has been awarded to estimates by academics from the 'water-bearing' profession, the daily amount has been awarded of water flows into the Adriatic valuable about a billion dollars. "Oh, if we were all packaged and sold as Evian or Fiji and if it nekto wanted to buy and pay for transport etc.
So why do not we see any investment has been awarded in this regard when it loses annually about 365 billion dollars just from Like? Fast all pots in hand and it is our salvation. (We and the wise men, 'scientists', has been awarded probably to pay an institute, where they are, of course, sacred cows because we' need to invest has been awarded in science, the only way to become competitive. ")
The second phrase is meaningless, although it is true, but not the way